Regular Car Reviews
YouTubeUS

Regular Car Reviews

@regularcars

We make fun of your favorite cars! Brian (Mr. Regular) and Nick (The Roman) are award-winning Automotive Journalists and former English teachers who use their Master's Degrees for ridiculing car culture! https://linktr.ee/regularcarreviews For all sponsorship inquiries, please contact RCR@adhesivemedia.com New 2nd channel "Regular and Roman" https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC521lEhTdxoyfjtwzYVXVNA

961K

Subscribers

401.3M

Total views

1.97K

Videos

Avg views (recent)

not yet captured

About Regular Car Reviews

Regular Car Reviews is a YouTube automotive channel operated by Brian (Mr. Regular) and Nick (The Roman), both award-winning automotive journalists and former English teachers with Master's Degrees. The channel has published 1,968 videos and accumulated 401,337,698 total views. The creators' stated mission is to critique and satirize car culture through an educational lens, leveraging their journalism background and academic training to deliver commentary that blends automotive analysis with humor. The channel operates from the United States and maintains a secondary entertainment classification alongside its primary automotive focus. A companion channel, "Regular and Roman," has been launched to expand the creators' content distribution. Sponsorship inquiries are directed to RCR@adhesivemedia.com, indicating representation through Adhesive Media. The channel's longevity and view accumulation reflect sustained audience engagement within the automotive YouTube ecosystem.

Regular Car Reviews's estimated sponsorship rates

Regular Car Reviews commands a typical sponsorship rate of $3,460 for integrated YouTube video placements, with a low estimate of $2,076 and a high estimate of $5,189. This pricing reflects the channel's mid-tier audience classification and positions it competitively within the automotive creator space. The rate structure is influenced by several factors: the channel's 961,000 subscriber base places it near peers such as Autogefühl (974,000 subs) and Tall Guy Car Reviews (866,000 subs), though below higher-tier automotive creators like Redline Reviews (1,090,000 subs) and E-CarLife (1,080,000 subs). Automotive content typically commands moderate CPM rates relative to finance or tech verticals, reflecting advertiser demand patterns in the category. The channel's niche positioning—satirical automotive criticism rather than product reviews or tutorials—may influence brand suitability and sponsorship selectivity. Geographic location in the US supports standard North American advertising rates. Format (YouTube video integration) and the creators' journalistic credibility as former English teachers contribute to perceived brand-safety value. Rates are algorithmic estimates based on subscriber count and niche multipliers; actual rates may vary based on campaign scope, exclusivity, and direct negotiation.

Who should partner with Regular Car Reviews?

Regular Car Reviews reaches approximately 961,000 YouTube subscribers with a cumulative view history of 401,337,698, indicating an average of roughly 204 views per published video across the channel's 1,968-video catalog. The audience is concentrated in the automotive enthusiast segment, encompassing car buyers, collectors, mechanics, and general automotive culture observers. The channel's satirical approach to car criticism attracts viewers interested in entertainment-driven automotive commentary rather than purely technical or instructional content. Brand affinity aligns with automotive manufacturers, aftermarket parts suppliers, automotive insurance providers, and lifestyle brands targeting car enthusiasts. Secondary entertainment classification suggests crossover appeal to audiences consuming humor and cultural commentary. Peer comparison indicates the audience sits within a competitive mid-tier band: Autogefühl (974,000 subs) and Tall Guy Car Reviews (866,000 subs) operate at similar scale, while larger automotive creators like Redline Reviews (1,090,000 subs) and E-CarLife (1,080,000 subs) command larger reach. The creators' background as former English teachers and award-winning journalists may appeal to audiences valuing critical analysis and articulate commentary over purely entertainment-focused automotive content. Specific brand categories best suited include automotive OEMs, insurance companies, automotive finance platforms, and lifestyle products marketed to car enthusiasts.

Regular Car Reviews's growth and performance

Snapshot data spans only one day (May 12, 2026), with the channel holding steady at 961,000 subscribers at both the first tracked and latest measurement points. This single-day observation provides insufficient basis for growth-rate analysis. Historical view accumulation of 401,337,698 across 1,968 published videos demonstrates sustained audience engagement over the channel's operational history, but granular growth trajectory data is not yet available. Average views for the last 30 days are not currently tracked in the database. To assess subscriber growth trends, retention patterns, or seasonal fluctuations, longer historical snapshots would be required.

How our pricing estimate works for Regular Car Reviews

The algorithmic price estimate of $3,460 (typical rate) is calculated using a formula that multiplies subscriber count by niche-specific CPM (cost per thousand impressions) and applies platform and format multipliers. For Regular Car Reviews, the estimate is based on 961,000 subscribers, automotive-category CPM benchmarks, and YouTube video-integration multipliers. The estimate is calibrated against zero community data points—meaning no direct sponsorship disclosures or historical rate confirmations from this creator are yet in the database—so the figure represents a model-based projection rather than observed market data. The low and high bounds ($2,076 and $5,189) reflect variance in CPM assumptions and campaign scope. Actual rates depend on factors including exclusivity, video length, placement prominence, and direct negotiation. For a detailed explanation of the methodology, see the /methodology page.